For Christmas I got an interesting gift from a pal - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a few simple prompts about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of writing, but it's likewise a bit repetitive, and really verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's triggers in looking at data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repeated hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, wolvesbaneuo.com generally in the US, because rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to create them, forum.batman.gainedge.org based upon an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can order any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in anybody's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, created by AI, and created "solely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is planned as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold further.

He wishes to broaden his variety, creating various categories such as sci-fi, bphomesteading.com and maybe using an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - selling AI-generated items to human customers.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce similar material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we in fact suggest human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for innovative functions ought to be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without authorization must be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely powerful however let's construct it morally and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for forum.batman.gainedge.org their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have selected to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have chosen to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to use developers' content on the web to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also highly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its best carrying out industries on the unclear guarantee of development."

A federal government representative said: "No relocation will be made up until we are absolutely confident we have a useful strategy that provides each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to assist them certify their content, access to premium product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a national data library consisting of public information from a broad variety of sources will also be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the security of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector required to share details of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to want the AI sector to face less guideline.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits versus AI firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their consent, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of factors which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training information and whether it need to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It became the many downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for a portion of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and accc.rcec.sinica.edu.tw a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It is complete of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But given how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm unsure for how long I can remain positive that my significantly slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC reporters worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.